Already a member? Click here to login.
Already a member? Click here to login.
ABSTRACT
An Australian National Consensus Position on Outcomes and Indicators for Diabetes Education identified knowledge and understanding as the outcomes most directly affected by diabetes education. A subsequent literature review failed to identify a validated, suitable questionnaire for measuring knowledge. Consequently, we aimed to develop a minimum diabetes knowledge questionnaire (DKQ) suitable for people with both type 1 and 2 diabetes.
Content validity was established through literature review, Delphi survey of 52 opinion leaders and a workshop of Australian Diabetes Educators (n ≥300). The resulting instrument was tested for internal consistency on 129 and for reliability on 57 people with
type 1 and 2 diabetes, respectively.The final questionnaire contains: 12 multiple choice questions common to type 1 and 2 diabetes, e.g. normal blood glucose levels, complications, diet, exercise, selfmonitoring of blood glucose, annual check-ups, support services, and sick-days; two questions for people on oral medication/insulin only; and one question (sick-days) for people with type 1 diabetes only.For the first 12 questions, the internal consistency was good (Cronbach’s α=0.73);with the additional item for type 1 diabetes, the internal consistency was slightly better (α=0.79) as it was with the additional items for people on medication/insulin (α=0.76).
No particular item seemed to adversely affect the overall consistency of the questionnaire. Comparing test-retest pilots, total scores showed good reliability with no evidence of change over time (t=1.73; df=56; p<0.85), and a correlation of 0.62. The DKQ is now ready to use for evaluating knowledge outcomes of diabetes education.
* Eigenmann C, Skinner T, Colagiuri R. Development and validation of a diabetes knowledge questionnare.Practice Diabetes Int. 20011;28(4).
For further information on the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire please click here to view the original article.
ABSTRACT
An Australian National Consensus Position on Outcomes and Indicators for Diabetes Education identified knowledge and understanding as the outcomes most directly affected by diabetes education. A subsequent literature review failed to identify a validated, suitable questionnaire for measuring knowledge. Consequently, we aimed to develop a minimum diabetes knowledge questionnaire (DKQ) suitable for people with both type 1 and 2 diabetes.
Content validity was established through literature review, Delphi survey of 52 opinion leaders and a workshop of Australian Diabetes Educators (n ≥300). The resulting instrument was tested for internal consistency on 129 and for reliability on 57 people with
type 1 and 2 diabetes, respectively.The final questionnaire contains: 12 multiple choice questions common to type 1 and 2 diabetes, e.g. normal blood glucose levels, complications, diet, exercise, selfmonitoring of blood glucose, annual check-ups, support services, and sick-days; two questions for people on oral medication/insulin only; and one question (sick-days) for people with type 1 diabetes only.For the first 12 questions, the internal consistency was good (Cronbach’s α=0.73);with the additional item for type 1 diabetes, the internal consistency was slightly better (α=0.79) as it was with the additional items for people on medication/insulin (α=0.76).
No particular item seemed to adversely affect the overall consistency of the questionnaire. Comparing test-retest pilots, total scores showed good reliability with no evidence of change over time (t=1.73; df=56; p<0.85), and a correlation of 0.62. The DKQ is now ready to use for evaluating knowledge outcomes of diabetes education.
* Eigenmann C, Skinner T, Colagiuri R. Development and validation of a diabetes knowledge questionnare.Practice Diabetes Int. 20011;28(4).
For further information on the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire please click here to view the original article.